Bellum Catilinae (The War with Catiline)
Bellum Catilinae
Catiline's conspiracy was a symptom, not an aberration, a sign that decades of moral decline brought on by wealth and empire had already corrupted the republic before any single conspirator tried to overthrow it.
- individual conspiracy read as symptom of systemic moral decline
- wealth and empire corrupting traditional Roman virtue
- terse, archaizing style as a counter-model to Livy
- vivid paired character sketches of Cato and Caesar
Sallust's monograph on the 63 BC conspiracy he had lived through as a younger man treats Catiline's failed coup less as an isolated crime than as evidence of Rome's broader moral collapse, tracing that decline to the destruction of Carthage, after which fear of a rival no longer restrained Roman greed and ambition. Written after Sallust's own political career ended in disgrace and retirement, the history is famous for its moralizing preface on virtue and decline, its psychologically vivid paired sketches of Cato and Caesar debating the conspirators' punishment, and a terse, archaizing prose style that became a second major stylistic model for Latin historiography alongside Livy's more expansive manner.
Commentary
Readers' notes on this work. No account needed - be scholarly, or at least civil.
Loading commentary…