Pharsalia (De Bello Civili)
Bellum Civile (Pharsalia)
Rome's civil war between Caesar and Pompey destroyed the republic so completely that no divine plan or higher meaning redeems the carnage, and an epic honest about that catastrophe must refuse the gods any role in explaining or excusing it.
- epic with the gods removed, driven instead by Fortune and human ambition
- sympathetic elevation of the losing republican side and Cato
- left unfinished at the poet's forced suicide under Nero
- influential on later poets skeptical of triumphant imperial epic
An unfinished epic in ten books on the civil war between Caesar and Pompey, left incomplete at Lucan's forced suicide at twenty-five after his involvement in the Pisonian conspiracy against Nero, radically breaking from Virgilian and Homeric convention by removing the gods entirely as active characters and treating Fortune, or simple human ambition and cruelty, as the only force driving Rome toward self-destruction. Lucan, Seneca's nephew and once a favorite of Nero before a personal and literary falling-out, gives sympathetic weight to the losing Pompeian and republican side, elevating the Stoic senator Cato into something close to the poem's moral center, and treats Caesar with an ambivalent mixture of fascination and condemnation unusual for a poem written under Caesar's own imperial successors. The poem's bleak, rhetorically excessive style divided ancient critics but proved deeply influential on later poets uncomfortable with celebratory imperial epic, including strong admiration from Dante.
Commentary
Readers' notes on this work. No account needed - be scholarly, or at least civil.
Loading commentary…